Archive for May, 2010

Using Influencers to Land New Trust Accounts

Many trust companies have more success marketing their services to the professionals who already have the ear of wealthy clients. Lawyers, investment advisors, accountants, even art appraisers are all worth adding to your network.

Plenty of trust companies are gathering assets by targeting the professional advisors who steer high-net-worth clients toward trusts in the first place.

Accountants, lawyers and other advisors rarely have the power to decide where a client opens a trust account, but they do have an enormous influence on the choice, says analyst Robert Testa, who covers the private wealth management industry for Cerulli Associates.

“Especially for trust companies, we’ve found these reciprocal relationships with other professionals are the most effective way to gain clients,” he told me.

Think of these professionals as the Oprah Winfreys of the wealth management world. Oprah doesn’t actually sell books, but one plug from her helps millions of potential book buyers make up their minds.

The relationship between estate planner and client works a lot like this, Testa says. When a lawyer or financial planner realizes that it’s time to move assets into a trust, the client rarely has a strong opinion on which trust company to go with. Instead, what the planner usually hears is, “What do you suggest?”

Being the answer to that magic question has translated into new business for 68% of the bank trust departments that Testa’s team polled last year, and independent trust service providers would be well served to follow suit.

It’s all about relationships

Estate planners are an obvious fit because they are at ground zero whenever a wealthy family decides to set up a new trust or modify an old one.

However, if you want to get the real inside track on how potential clients’ financial situations are changing, get friendly with their accountants, Testa says.

“You would think people would be more honest with the trust officer or the asset manager, but the CPA knows everything,” he explains. “Once you get a close relationship with the CPA, you can gather the assets.”

Corporate entitities can wield influence  too. Millennium Trust got a substantial profile boost this spring when Schwab Advisor Services pointed it out to its 6,000 advisors as a custodian for alternative assets that were no longer welcome on the Schwab platform.

“What we’re able to do is go after the advisor market,” Mary Hackbarth, who heads up Millennium’s marketing, told me.  “In terms of business strategy, working with advisors as centers of influence has worked out.”

Even an influential brand goes a long way. When the Dow Jones news service wrote up trust consulting firm Advisors Institutional Services, its marketing team was quick to license reprints that paired the story with the venerable Wall Street Journal logo. While it isn’t an endorsement, the logo still has a positive influence on prospective clients.

Anyone in a position to weigh in on the decision-making process is a potential referral source. Real estate brokers and insurance agents are worth adding to your professional network because they’re often on the scene when people make pivotal life decisions or come into significant wealth.

Robert Testa also recommends cultivating more esoteric professionals on the off chance that they’ll have the right ear at the right time.

“We’ve even heard that the art valuation experts at UBS have referred their clients toward trust companies,” he tells me.

Double-edged sword

Naturally, financial planners and other registered investment advisors are a time-honored center of influence. Jocelyn Schwartz, who ran Fidelity’s estate planning business and is now a financial planner at Pillar Financial Advisors, is often in a position to direct new business to trust companies and the lawyers who write up trust agreements.

She’s also used her influence to move accounts from legacy providers.

“We do spend a lot of time reviewing existing trusts,” she told me. “Disrupting the apple cart is not our first goal, but sometimes we get a client who just isn’t happy no matter what the trustee does, and then that money has to move.”

While Schwartz is happy to work with trust companies that won’t let Pillar manage the underlying assets, other wealth managers are wary of referring their clients to a potential competitor.

“They’re afraid that giving a Wilmington or a Glenmede custody of the assets means the next call their clients get will be from a Wilmington or Glenmede investment advisor,” says Antony Joffe, whose new public trust company Sterling Trustees plans to aggressively market to lawyers and accountants as well as RIAs.

Some trust companies get around this potential conflict of interest by only working with directed trusts and other arrangements that kick the investment responsibilities (and fees) back to the referring advisor. Sterling doesn’t quite do this—Joffe reserves the fiduciary right to fire managers even if they brought in the account in the first place—but plenty of other direct-trust-only providers do.

“We don’t compete with the intermediaries,” Reggie Karas, who runs Millennium Trust’s alternative asset business, told me. “We’re a very plain vanilla service provider by design so we can better build our business in partnership with them,” she added.

In fact, a really successful influencing relationship is always going to be a two-way street, Robert Testa says. Trust companies get the accounts, while influencers get the opportunity to prove their value as a one-stop source for all their clients’ needs—and sometimes even get prospects of their own passed back along the chain.

“Reciprocity is crucial,” he told me. “A trust company with a preferred relationship with an estate planner can suggest that person when trust documents need to be modified,” he added.

“A lot of clients who are missing a piece of their own professional advice network are at a loss. A suggestion goes a long way to getting the best outcome for everyone.”

Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes  contributed to the research and the editing

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/influencers

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 Comment

WSJ Reports on Firm That Helps Wealth Advisors Start Trust Companies

MARSHFIELD, Mass., May 28 /PRNewswire/ — The Wall Street Journal recently profiled Advisors Institutional Services in the context of increased interest from wealth managers, investment advisors, broker-dealers and other financial institutions in creating and operating trust companies in South Dakota.

Helping Wealth Firms Start Trust Companies

As the WSJ story points out, South Dakota is becoming the top choice for trust providers. With ten new launches this year and a roster of 50 institutions currently conducting trust business in the wealth-friendly state, it’s easy to see why banks and advisors alike are flocking to South Dakota.

Advisors Institutional Services helps financial professionals, law firms, pension plan administrators and banks determine whether a South Dakota-based trust company would complement their current service offerings and, if so, assists them in applying for a trust company license in the state and lining up operational support.

Most recently, Advisors International helped Pittsburgh-based fund processor Mid Atlantic Capital Group apply for a South Dakota trust charter, said President Les Revzon.

“The aging of the baby boomers has created an enormous need for trust services,” Mr. Revzon said. “Our outstanding launch team has helped both boutique wealth managers and large institutions like Mid Atlantic Capital Group  – which has $19 billion on its platform — compete in this increasingly important market.”

In fact, the WSJ story highlights a 2007 study by asset manager Franklin Templeton that concluded that some independent investment advisors could see 80% of the assets they manage move into trust accounts over the next decade as aging clients retire.

“A full 40% of today’s wealthiest Americans have no will or trust in place,” Mr. Revzon said. “The opportunities for those who provide such services are enormous.”

South Dakota offers would-be trust providers numerous operational advantages, including low capital requirements, no state taxes on corporations or individuals, the ability to support all major types of trust structures (including asset protection trusts and multi-generational or “dynastic” trusts), and a favorable view on out-of-state entities setting up trust representative offices elsewhere.

For more on the opportunity that operating a trust business in South Dakota represents for financial professionals around the country, Advisors Institutional Services has published a special report, “Launching a South Dakota Trust Company: Guide to Operating Nationwide.”

Source Link: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/wsj-reports-on-firm-that-helps-wealth-advisors-start-trust-companies-95106044.html

, , , , , ,

No Comments

Dow Jones Weighs in on South Dakota Trusts

Dow Jones is not blind to either the burgeoning interest in South Dakota as a trust-friendly jurisdiction or state regulators’ desire to make sure trust companies that set up shop are well capitalized and high quality.

Here’s an excerpt from DJ reporter Arden Dale’s recent article:

South Dakota began making a push to attract trust business with a key statute it put on the books in 1995. It now ranks with Delaware, Nevada and Alaska as one of the most popular places to set up a trust company.

South Dakota historically has attracted an especially large number of private trust companies, which are run by family members. About five years ago, though, more public companies began coming in, according to Bret Afdahl, division counsel at the South Dakota Division of Banking.

The state updates its trust law annually, through a governor’s task force on trust administration

, ,

No Comments

Bickering Senators Delay Estate Tax Fix

More chest-pounding tactics between lawmakers imperil speedy resolution for long-term estate tax repair.  Senator Baucus’ office told us deal is far from complete.

With Democratic leadership and Republicans blaming each other, it looks like negotiations to roll back the currently repealed federal estate tax to 2009 levels when it kicks back in next year have been wrecked.

A staffer in Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus’ office told me that “Republican objections” had stalemated recent progress toward estate tax clarity.

Since the deal would have given Republicans just about everything they’ve asked for, including a $5 million exemption (rising with inflation) and a 35% maximum rate, those objections were more about Senate procedure than the tax code.

From the Republican camp, John Kyl of Arizona, Senate minority whip, threw the blame back across the aisle.

“We no longer have an agreement,” he told reporters, “because the Democratic side has decided that unless a matter has a guaranteed majority of Democratic votes going in, they’re not going to allow it on the floor.”

Reading between the lines

What Kyl means is that while Baucus and other leading Democrats been ready to deal, many rank-and-file party members would probably balk any serious estate tax overhaul until after the November elections.

If the Senate does nothing, the tax resets on January 1 with an exemption of $1 million and a maximum rate of 60%. Senator Bob Casey of Pennsylvania estimates that maybe 80% of his fellow Democrats are willing to let this happen because, in his words, tax relief for wealthy families looks “offensive” given massive federal revenue deficits.

As the Baucus aide told me, it boils down to not enough votes even if all Republicans are on board. “He understands the political realities of what can pass the Senate,” she says.

Estate planners are disappointed, but not surprised.

“It can be almost impossible to cut through the Washington chatter, but it’s basically shenanigans as usual,” says New York attorney Martin Shenkman. “The underlying mood is that tax rates across the board are rising, and estate tax is part of that conversation,” he added.

Shenkman wouldn’t be stunned to see the Senate run out the clock and let the exemption reset at $1 million, even though that would expose about seven times as many families to estate tax liabilities.

Of course, that would keep Shenkman and his peers busy. Wider estate tax concerns naturally feed interest in trusts and other estate planning vehicles designed to reduce the size of a taxable estate, minimizing the eventual IRS bill or eliminating it altogether.

Paying the death tax in advance

Early gossip around the now-stalled deal focused on whether it would give people the option of paying estate tax while they’re still alive.

On the surface, the idea of transferring property into what Kyl calls a “prepayment trust” is interesting, not to mention a potential growth business for trust companies.

But in practice, there doesn’t seem to be a compelling argument for wealthy families to assign their assets to one of these vehicles and pay their estate tax in installments when they can simply go with an old-fashioned irrevocable trust instead.

While Kyl will probably keep pushing the idea in future negotiations, it’s probably not going to go anywhere.

Likewise, talk of restoring the estate tax in 2010 and making it retroactive to the beginning of the year seems to have fizzled out. Every day the Senate drags out the process makes any retroactive tax a bigger headache for executors. If we don’t get any action before November, the odds drop to near zero.

Nobody expected things to drag on as far as they have. “It’s incredible that Congress had nine years to fix this and not only waited until the deadline, but went past the deadline,” says Jonathan Siegel, a law professor at George Washington University.

“They’re like college students who waited until something was due and then pulled an all-nighter,” he added. “That’s too crazy, even for Congress.”

Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog.

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/estatefix

, , , , ,

No Comments

Nevada Lawyer Offers Teleconference to Promote Asset Protection Trusts

Advisors who want to learn more about the differences between asset protection trust states should get a good running start from an upcoming teleconference.

Estate planner Steve Oshins of Las Vegas firm Oshins & Associates will be on hand on Thursday, June 10, to explain the inner workings of asset protection trusts and the differences between how different states handle these vehicles, which are designed to shield wealth from litigation.

The event is $99 and according to the promotional material there will be a Q&A at the end of the hour-long seminar.

For more details and registration information, take a look at http://www.ultimateestateplanner.com/DAPT.html.

,

No Comments