Posts Tagged Bret Afdahl

Bret Afdahl Appointed South Dakota Banking Chief

As the state’s new top regulator, Afdahl inherits oversight over $75 billion in trust assets and an ever-growing list of independent trust companies looking to take advantage of world-class statutes.

The nationwide search to find a replacement for Roger Novotny as head of South Dakota’s Division of Banking has ended with a local favorite — Bret Afdahl — getting the job.

Previously the division’s counsel and trust examiner, Afdahl is known as a “business-friendly” regulator who’s willing to get tough when he sees a problem at an institution, but is also happy to work with South Dakota’s 52 trust companies.

Given the fact that lawmakers are still making the state’s trust rules even more attractive — driving plenty of applications from cross-border banks, RIAs and other entities hungry for a South Dakota charter — that attitude almost certainly makes him the right man for the job.

No real surprise, locals say

The fact that South Dakota promoted an insider comes as no surprise to members of the local trust community, who’ve been telling me for awhile now that given Governor Dennis Daugaard’s own background as a trust administrator, promoting this business is a priority in Pierre.

As Sioux Falls estate attorney Daniel Donohue told me, the public job listing that hit the message boards back in March was probably just a way to make sure the state wasn’t cheating itself out of any spectacular long-distance candidates willing to take the reins.

“The public listing served largely to make sure they were casting the widest net possible,” he says.

But at the end of the day, few outsiders could ever know South Dakota’s universe of trust companies better than Afdahl, who helped review several of their charter applications over the last five years.

“An extensive search was conducted for the director position,” says Pam Roberts, the state’s newly anointed secretary of labor and regulation and herself a veteran of the banking industry.

“The best candidate ended up being from within the division, and I am excited for Bret to exercise his leadership capabilities and industry knowledge in this new role.”

New rules are already driving fresh applications

 

The latest improvements in South Dakota’s trust code should give Afdahl plenty of applications to review from both established out-of-state trust companies and start-ups.

In just the last few weeks, Michigan RIA firm Old Mission Investment Company filed the paperwork to start a South Dakota trust company — and, perhaps optimistically, registered various domain names to get the business moving as soon as it has its charter.

Old Mission CEO Christopher Lamb confirms that he’s applied, but understandably didn’t want to say anything that might prejudice the process.

For an eager entrant like Old Mission, South Dakota offers several distinct advantages. First, the state supports all major forms of trust arrangement, including dynastic trusts, asset protection trusts and directed trusts.

Coupled with relatively low capital requirements and the complete absence of state income tax, the state has successfully captured tens of billions of dollars from entrenched top-tier competitors like Delaware.

And the state is nowhere near ready to rest on its laurels. One of Governor Daugaard’s first official acts in office was signing House Bill 1155 into law back in March.

The bill, which Dan Donohue notes was written under the auspices of South Dakota’s long-standing task force for trust law reform, is yet another salvo in a long-term crusade to compete even more effectively for trust assets.

Previously, South Dakota’s asset protection statutes were considered better than most, but still somewhat weaker than those of archrivals Alaska and Nevada.

Both Alaska and Nevada allow people to “retroactively” protect their wealth by transferring it into trust, even if legal claims on that money are already on the table — except, naturally, where the transfer would be a fraudulent conveyance.

HB 1155 removes the preexisting claim exemption from South Dakota’s trust code, putting the state on more equal footing with Alaska in particular.

Once the new law goes into effect on July 1, we could see more trust assets flow toward South Dakota — and in any event, the decision to seek the strongest asset protection out there will get a little less clear-cut.

Moving fast to avoid policy drift

While some insiders had expected confirmation that Afdahl would be taking the regulatory reins from retiring boss Roger Novotny as early as May 4, the official announcement came last Wednesday.

Despite that extra week, the process seemed to move incredibly fast compared to the nine months it took to hire Novotny back in 2004.

Back then, South Dakota’s evolution into one of the biggest success stories of the trust industry was just getting underway. When Novotny took over, the state could boast maybe 17 state-chartered trust institutions with a little over $20 billion in assets between them.

Now, Afdahl inherits a thriving regulatory portfolio of 52 public and private trust companies that manage $75 billion.

He’ll also be responsible for monitoring the health of  62 banks, which only have $18 billion collectively and so demonstrate that in South Dakota, trusts are the main attraction.

And no wonder. While the state’s banks are in better shape than their counterparts elsewhere in the country, the number of depositary institutions the Division of Banking oversees has steadily declined over the last 15 years and their assets plunged in 2008 and 2009 during the credit crisis.

Afdahl may spend some time in his new job nurturing the trust companies, but he may find his biggest challenges rooting out the weakest lenders.

Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steve Maimes contributed to the editing and research.

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/afdahl

, , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

South Dakota Sets Record for New Trust Companies

South Dakota is becoming the top choice for trust providers. With ten new launches this year and a roster of 50 institutions shortly, it’s easy to see why banks and advisors alike are flocking to the wealth-friendly state. But despite the welcome mat, screening for new players “isn’t easy.”

This week, the South Dakota Division of Banking announced that Pittsburgh-based Mid Atlantic Capital Group, a $19 billion wealth manager and trust technology provider, applied to receive a charter. Approval is expected before July 1.

Mid Atlantic’s not the only Pennsylvania trust operation to set up shop in South Dakota. Earlier this year, Consohocken, PA-based multi-family office Sterling Trustees decided too that South Dakota’s compelling trust benefits made it better than the other no-tax dynasty trust states.

Sterling’s president Antony Joffe told me, “We picked South Dakota because we wanted the best trust law environment and thought they had what we needed.”

They just received official approval this week and are now ramping up ambitious plans to offer trust services to registered investment advisors, as well as more effectively run the roughly $500 million in high-net-worth trust accounts they already have.

Sterling is one of seven public trust company going through South Dakota’s approval process this year. Denver-based United Western Bancorp’s UW Trust Company, with $2.6 billion in assets, received its approval at the end of March.

Counting Mid Atlantic, three other applications in the pipeline, and private trust companies, and a record 10 companies have entered the South Dakota system so far this year.

One of them, Kingsbridge Trust Company, was launched by Kingsbridge Private Wealth Management of Las Vegas to complete its suite of family office services. CEO David Dunn told the Trust Advisor Blog that the process “isn’t easy,” with hours of meeting with regulators and answering tough questions. “It required a great deal of background work just to file the application,” he says.

“We’re okay with startups”

What’s driving the flood? Five months ago, Les Revzon, president of trust consulting firm Advisors Institutional, who assisted Mid Atlantic with its trust charter application, attended a meeting in Pittsburgh with Mid Atlantic VIP’s to lay out the case for why South Dakota might be the best place to host its new trust company operations.

It didn’t take more than 10 minutes for the honchos at the table to overwhelmingly agree that South Dakota would be their new home. With the benefits adding up—no taxes, dynasty trusts, asset protection trusts, directed trusts, low capital requirements and affordable on-the-ground services—they were sold. All of that sounded a lot better than posting $1 million in regulatory capital in Nevada or Delaware, big staffing costs and waiting over a year for a trust charter.

The interest in the state’s trust environment isn’t too surprising, says Bret Afdahl, counsel for the South Dakota Division of Banking.

“We’re business-friendly, which means that we want our trust companies to succeed,” he told me. “Profit is not a swear word in our state.”

Afdahl likes to discuss the advantages of his state’s trust jurisdiction, and with good reason: According to state statistics, the Division of Banking booked a record $262,651 in trust-oriented revenue last year in the form of examination and supervision fees.

To attract new institutions that measure up, capital requirements are low. A trust company needs to post $200,000 to set up shop in the state. Other centers of the trust industry like Delaware and Nevada require $1 million or more to obtain a trust charter.

New legislation kicks in July 1 to tighten the capital requirements at regulators’ discretion, but this is aimed at established institutions that might run into trouble, Afdahl told me. “We’ll keep it low on the front end to allow for startups,” he says.

Although the new rules also mandate additional background checks for principals and key employees, the South Dakota approval process is streamlined compared to other jurisdictions.

Antony Joffe got the green light in about five weeks, compared to an estimated year to move an application through the Delaware system or up to two years of dealing with the FDIC for a federal trust charter.

Nevada’s quest for modernization

By sheer number of operating trust companies, South Dakota has leapt ahead of Nevada and even Delaware.

Nevada’s lack of appeal for new trust institutions seems odd when you consider that the state went through a great show of modernizing its trust statutes late last year in order to attract new business.

State regulators wouldn’t comment on success or failure. However, a source familiar with local politics says “updating” the rules was less about making the state friendlier to public trust companies and more about setting up barriers to entry.

“You can probably read behind the lines and see that the number of public trust companies in the state hasn’t budged this year,” my source told me. “The new capital requirements make it more difficult for public companies to be formed.”

We were unable to interview officials from Delaware, but according to Bret Afdahl, the issue for that state’s regulators is “quality,” or at least exclusivity. Delaware is legendary for enforcing extremely stringent audit and residence standards that can be too expensive for smaller players to consider.

“Delaware’s rules only really allow for big companies,” he told me. “You need X square feet and Y full-time employees, of whom Z must be trust officers. It doesn’t disallow startups, but you need to be pretty big to cover the initial expenses.”

When it comes to operating on the ground in South Dakota, Sterling Trustees’ Antony Joffe is excited. He plans to set up an office and move all his existing fiduciary activities there.

“We’ll still manage some trusts here in Philadelphia on an individual basis, but we’re going to try to run as much as we can out of South Dakota,” he told me.

Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes and senior editor Jerry Cooper contributed.

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/sd-record

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments