Posts Tagged divorce

21 Signs That Your Husband May Be Hiding Marital Assets During Your Divorce

Last week, while my post about hidden assets was racking up thousands of readers, news broke that a Russian billionaire allegedly bought an $88 million apartment as a ploy to scam his wife during their divorce.

To me, these related –albeit completely independent –events are evidence of two key points: 1) The topic of husbands hiding assets hits a nerve with many women, and 2) Husbands hide assets (or at least, try to hide assets) much more frequently than most wives expect.

So, let’s keep this conversation going.

Today, I’d like to dig a little deeper into the topic of hidden assets, and to do so, I’ve enlisted the help of my colleague, Miles Mason, Sr., JD, CPA, founder of Miles Mason Family Law Group, PLC, in Memphis, Tennessee, and author of The Forensic Accounting Deskbook: A Practical Guide to Financial Investigation and Analysis for Family Lawyers, published by the American Bar Association.

As Miles points out, it’s important to shine a spotlight on the topic of hiding assets because divorcing women are often too shy or intimidated to report their husbands’ dirty tricks. Why? Because divorce victims mirror fraud victims.

“Fraud victims are often too embarrassed to report the crime,” Miles explains. ”Spouses married to persons lying, cheating and stealing in the divorce become demoralized. The spouse counts on the victim’s will breaking down. Victims blame themselves and want to settle for less than a reasonable settlement.”

If you’re divorcing, please don’t let that happen to you. Educate yourself and lean on the expertise of a qualified divorce team to help you get the settlement you deserve. To help you wrap your arms around this complicated topic, here are a few of “the basics” Miles teaches his clients:

Red flags seem obvious, once you know what to look for. You may have good reason to be suspicious if your husband:

• Maintains complete control of bank account information and online passwords.

• Is secretive about financial affairs.

• Owns a P.O. box or private mail drop box, which receives account statements and bills.

• Has meaningful unreimbursed business account expenses.

• Deletes one or more personal financial programs, Quicken or Quickbooks.

• Says the computer containing important financial records has mysteriously “crashed.” Then, he removes the hard drive for a data retrieval attempt, and it’s never to be seen again.

• Acts pushy when obtaining signatures on important documents, like tax returns and deeds. “I need to get this to our accountant today,” he insists.

• Proposes an execution of mutual durable power of attorneys for “estate planning” purposes.

• Enjoys out-of-town business junkets with his befriended, slippery financial advisor.

• Develops SIDS (Sudden Income Deficit Syndrome). “My business is failing” suddenly crops up.

• Suffers an income decrease without a corresponding reduction of expenses.

• Binges on unusual purchases of flashy items, such as a car and jewelry.

• Reports a dramatic decrease in value of marital and/or business investments.

• Owns multiple cell phones or numbers over a relatively short period of time.

• Makes frequent trips to countries with relaxed banking laws.

• Exhibits childish greed and claims of entitlement.

• Makes unusual purchases of toys or art that could be sold later.

• Starts drawing on large amounts of debt.

• Is involved in drug abuse.

• Gambles more frequently than usual and is placing money “on account” with casinos.

• Opens multiple business or personal bank accounts without obvious reasons for having that many.

A husband who hides assets usually has very specific, predictable objectives. In general terms, his goals are to:

1. Hide, understate, or undervalue certain assets,

2. Overstate debts,

3. Report lower than actual revenue, and/or

4. Report higher than actual expenses.

Most tactics are predictabletoo. Here are a few of the most predictable strategies Miles has seen, along with the advantages and disadvantages for each:

• Hoarding unrecorded cashAdvantage: Removing cash (currency) lacks a paper trail, and offshore bank accounts are relatively easy (from a legal standpoint) to open. Disadvantage: Laundering over $100,000 in currency can be time consuming and will likely require travel. Depending on the circumstances, this tactic could involve the very serious criminal acts of money laundering, violation of cash transfer reporting requirements, federal income tax fraud and perjury.

• Secreting already recorded cash receiptsAdvantage: This can be completed as part of a complex accounting scheme, which may be too complicated or expensive to discover. Disadvantage: Once cash is recorded, its absence or transfer is discoverable.

• Understating revenue. Advantage: The business owner has lots of options from which to choose. Some are simple and easy. Deferring revenue by manipulating the timing of revenue or accounts receivable may not constitute tax fraud. Disadvantage: Depending on the business owner’s sophistication, this can require a fairly predictable co-conspirator. If the co-conspirator is placed under oath, the scheme could result in perjury charges for the husband.

Scams to hide money often involve handing cash or transferring ownership of valuable assets to buddies, siblings, or parents to hold until sometime after the divorce is final. These schemes usually include deceptive cover stories, financial statement manipulation and lying under oath. Sometimes the stories even become more intricate, involving failing businesses, gambling addictions and other personal failures.

“The more believable the story is that the money is gone, the more likely the victim will give up looking for it,” Miles says.

Let’s consider an example. Pretend your husband’s business owns a vacant building. Your husband may complain that the property taxes are long overdue and the building is worth less than the cost of paying them. Then, prior to the divorce filing, he brags that the business sold the building to a stupid investor who is now “stuck” with having to pay the overdue taxes. At first this may sound like a great deal: the business is rid of the purported albatross, and the business and marital estate is purportedly saved thousands of dollars. But, the reality is quite different. The taxes were never behind, and the purchaser was your husband’s nefarious financial advisor and personal friend. The transfer was recorded, but the handshake deal will result in your husband and his friend splitting the profits from its sale a year or so after the divorce.

As I pointed out last week, timing is critical to detect schemes using financial statement manipulation, and benchmarks are key. Ideally, a woman must be financially aware and involved from the onset of her marriage. Consistent participation from the start is critically important because: 1) If your husband has been hiding income/assets over years or decades, it will become virtually impossible to trace/find them, and 2) Being financially aware and involved helps form the foundation of happy marriages where a divorce is not even a possibility. (If your husband becomes incapacitated or dies, a working knowledge of your assets/liabilities and income/expenses and where all your accounts and important documents are located will be vitally important.)

Remember, your husband doesn’t have to be a billionaire to be guilty of hiding assets. Dirty tricks happen more often than women expect, and you’ll need to Think Financially, Not Emotionally so you can keep your finances intact during the divorce proceedings while you plan for a secure financial future post-divorce, as well.

- Jeffrey A. Landers, is a Divorce Financial Strategist and the founder of Bedrock Divorce Advisors, LLC (http://www.BedrockDivorce.com )

The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, who is not an attorney.

Source:  Forbes

Posted by Steven Maimes, The Trust Advisor.

Permalink:  http://thetrustadvisor.com/headlines/21-signs

, , ,

No Comments

Mistresses and Broken Marriages Cost Arnold, Tiger and Kobe Millions: Wealth-Wise Tips for Spouses Thinking About Straying from the Nest

Infidelity is an age-old way for your clients to lose their wives and, in the wrong circumstances, their assets. The key, experts say, is to know their weaknesses — and have an asset protection plan in place before they give in to temptation.

Tiger Woods settled $100 million of his $600 million fortune on his ex-wife Elin and agreed to pay her a reported $20,000 a month in support, provided she refuses to talk about his private life.

The sports books are giving 3/2 odds that Kobe Bryant ends up giving Vanessa at least $100 million of his $300 million. And the Schwarzenegger-Shriver family are still at the negotiating table six months after Maria filed for divorce.

What all these men have in common is wealth and adultery. Before one of your clients becomes the next Schwarzenegger, Woods or Bryant, make sure they’ve done everything they can to keep from destroying their marriages and their net worth.

1. Asset protection comes first. A properly drafted trust well while your client is still single removes the money from any consideration of what becomes marital property and what doesn’t when the marriage breaks down.

Even in a community property state like California — home of the Schwarzeneggers and the Bryants — assets assigned to a trust well in advance of the wedding are generally shielded from the divorce court split because they’re never commingled in the first place.

Old money has known for generations that this is how you keep family property in the family, no matter who the kids marry. After all, Maria Shriver’s share of the Kennedy fortune came down to her alone through trusts, and she’ll probably keep it after she and Arnold finalize their divorce.

As Nashville estate planner Bryan Howard tells me, asset protection trusts are running neck-and-neck with prenuptial agreements in his practice as parents move to lock up the kids’ money before there’s even a love interest in the picture.

Besides, wealthy celebrities are magnets for lawsuits and should have asset protection trusts anyway to protect their wealth from creditors. Depending on the state, these vehicles can offer added armor against an aggrieved ex-spouse as well.

2. Take care with the prenuptial agreement. Every state now allows “no fault” divorces, so the question of which spouse was unfaithful no longer plays the huge role in court that it once did.

Back then, a wife or wronged husband who could prove adultery had a huge advantage in forcing a split of the marital assets. Now, it only matters if the cheating spouse wants support or, according to divorce guru Matt O’Connell, there’s a prenup in play.

“Often times, prenuptial agreements have a clause stating if infidelity is involved, the settlement is affected” he explains.

“But if you have no prenuptial agreement or there is no specific clause, adultery will not be an issue.”

Eliminate the clause, and your clients can get their future spouses to sign away all rights to the money up front — or, in a more generous scenario, limit their claim on the marital property to a fixed dollar amount.

Thanks to Tiger Woods’ lawyers, his original prenup would have given Elin maybe $20 million, a measly 3% of his vast fortune.

Unfortunately, his lawyers failed to secure two things that matters even more to the low-profile golf god than his $60 million Florida estate: his privacy and his kids.

Getting Elin to sign a post-nuptial non-confidentiality agreement and agree to joint custody raised the final bill to $100 million. That’s still a pittance compared to the $300 million she could have gotten in a 50-50 split.

And it’s better than Arnold and Kobe, neither of whom seems to have any agreement at all in place and are back on the hook for half their assets.

3. Don’t do it at all. Remind your clients with roving eyes of the cost of straying. It’s a simple trick of behavioral economics, but if Arnold or Kobe or Tiger had thought ten seconds about the 9-digit price tag on their infidelities, they probably wouldn’t be in the position they’re in now.

Adultery sets up patterns of behavior that get people in deeper trouble. With Arnold, for example, Maria hired a private detective to dig into his double life.

Were there more illegitimate children lurking in his past? Was he diverting marital assets to pay for gifts to his mistresses? Either would count against him in the settlement, not to mention do even more damage to his carefully nourished “family values” image.

Tiger Woods reportedly paid his girlfriends over $10 million to keep quiet. That gave Ellin a lot more negotiating power.

Ultimately, if your client gets caught, the experts say, he needs to confess everything then and there. Time for big presents to buy time — Ellin Woods and Vanessa Bryant both got major jewelry when they first caught their husbands cheating — and big planning for a final split down the road.

Sure, any couple might get back together. But with the sports book giving relatively long odds of 2 to 1 against Kobe paying Vanessa less than $50 million, there’s enough money at stake for a good advisor to earn his or her fees here and, naturally, keep the assets from moving from one side of the aisle to the other.

Scott Martin, senior editor, The Trust Advisor. Steve Maimes and Jerry Cooper contributed to the research.

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/infidelity

, , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

Would an Asset Protection Trust Work for Tiger Woods?

Alaska practitioner claims asset protection trusts are good advice in marital disputes. But others disagree.

If Tiger Woods is lucky, coming clean about all those affairs will help him salvage his marriage. But if he and Elin split up anyway, apologizing might at least have earned him some time to shelter his hard-won $600 million fortune from the divorce court.

Estate lawyer David Shaftel of Anchorage, Alaska says that even people who’ve been married for years can set up an asset protection trust. “We can do them after the marriage,” he told The Trust Advisor.

Community property laws can raise questions about trusts funded with marital assets without spousal consent, Shaftel says, but since Tiger lives in Florida, a non-community property state, there’s no problem. He doesn’t need his wife’s consent to fund the trust, and his wife’s lawyers would have a hard time touching his assets as long as he keeps enough cash on hand to meet the terms of the prenuptial agreement.

Once the assets are in the trust, he no longer has the keys to the safe and can tell the court that he doesn’t have access to the money. If she divorces him and can get what he’s already promised to settle on her, he’s home free. The asset protection trust did its job.

Needless to say, the public probably wouldn’t like the idea of him shielding his assets from the court using the trust. Personal finance gurus like Jean Chatzky—who loves prenuptial agreements for being less “cold-blooded”—bristle at the notion.

“When they’re used in that way, I find trusts sneaky and underhanded,” one Chatzky column warned Money readers. “A well-executed prenup or post-nup will do the same thing.”

Before the Honeymoon Even Starts

For better or worse, Tiger’s original prenup reportedly gave Elin $20 million if she stayed with him through 2014; rumor has it he’s since sweetened the deal substantially to keep her from walking out. Estate lawyers around the country say their clients who don’t want to follow in his footsteps are showing a lot of interest in asset protection trusts before walking down the aisle.

“I’ve probably set up as many asset protection trusts as I have prenuptial agreements since we had the trust option,” Bryan Howard, a founding partner of Nashville, Tennessee estate planning firm Howard & Mobley PLLC, told The Trust Advisor.

“More than half of the 20-somethings don’t do prenuptial agreements any more. Protecting these assets is just not something that occurs to young kids. But it definitely occurs to their wealthy parents.”

In fact, Howard says his clients are so enthusiastic about these trusts that they’re setting them up for the kids before that special someone is even in the picture. Unlike a traditional prenup, which requires a bride or groom to sign the papers, an asset management trust can be created early on and then filed away; even if the kids elope, the assets are safe.

This sort of preemptive divorce protection works well for Shaftel too. Since so many couples prefer not to talk about the money, getting the transaction out of the way before they’re even a couple keeps it from getting bogged down in personal issues or questions of marital consent.

Opinions vary as to whether couples need both a prenup and a trust. Howard has a belt and suspenders philosophy and recommends both types of paperwork for his clients if possible. He argues that a prenup provides a useful structure for discussions about alimony—Tennessee trusts are vulnerable if payments are delinquent—and wealth that the couple may acquire during marriage.

Alaska, Nevada and Beyond

If Tiger’s lawyers decide he needs a trust, where should they go? In most asset protection states, spouses are “exempted creditors,” which means that they can get around the protection that trusts normally provide. But in Alaska and Nevada, an ex-spouse is considered just another creditor, says Douglas Blattmachr, founder of the Alaska Trust Company.

“We’re one of the only states that I’m aware of that doesn’t have that special class of creditor,” he told me. “In Delaware, there’s a whole string of creditors that can get the assets. Same with South Dakota.”

It’s a relatively minor difference, but one that still drives some out-of-state trust traffic to Alaska, says Blattmachr, who knows the state’s statutes better than most. His brother drafted the law that opened the state up to independent trust companies in the first place.

Alaska offers confidence when it comes to estate tax treatment. As of July 15, the IRS resolved a gray area in the tax code by confirming that the state’s self-settled spendthrift trusts—the formal name for these vehicles—are in fact exempt from estate tax even though the grantor can still draw on them as needed.

Both Blattmachr and Anchorage attorney David Shaftel agree that this “sweet spot” between favorable tax treatment and accessibility in an emergency helps to create a lot of interest in Alaska-based trust structures.

“It’s become almost a default technique here,” Shaftel told me. “People are much more comfortable gifting or selling assets to the irrevocable trust if they can enjoy the psychological security of knowing they can draw on these assets if they need them.”

“Hell No!”

Another, often overlooked benefit of the trust environment in states like Alaska and Nevada where divorce planning is concerned: These trusts protect the family’s assets not just for the current generation, but for centuries. In other words, even if the kids or grandkids make a terrible match, the trust remains secure.

“In the estate planning field, the creditor the older generation is most concerned about is the ex-spouse if a child gets divorced,” Shaftel said. “Is that inheritance going to be divorced and given to the ex? That’s a very high driver of interest.”

Blattmachr sees this too. “That one-in-two chance that a couple will get divorced applies to future generations as well. Do you want your ex-son-in-law to get your assets? Whenever I ask a couple that, they say ‘Hell no!’ Whatever happens with the estate tax, that ‘Hell no’ will be with us always.”

Tiger’s kids aren’t old enough to worry about, but with $600 million on the line, it’s a good bet the family lawyers are at least thinking that far ahead.

Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog.  Steven Maimes contributed to the research and editing.

Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/would-an-asset-protection-trust-work-for-tiger-woods

, , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments