Posts Tagged L. Scott Walshaw
The Trust Advisor Presents Special Trust Webinar February 14
Posted by Scott Martin in Headlines on January 22, 2012
According to the research firm Cerulli, the number of new trust companies operating nationwide has doubled since 2001. But how do advisors navigate this increasingly crowded space?
The Trust Advisor will be conducting an online webinar on February 14 to provide a few answers.
Seats are limited to the first 500 registrants and participation is free for Trust Advisor subscribers. All others will have to pay $99 to hear what our all-star panel has to say:
* Robert Testa, analyst with Cerulli
* Mark V. Purpura, Delaware trust attorney
* Robert Ellis, trust technology expert
* Brian Williams, branding expert
* L. Scott Walshaw, Nevada’s former banking commissioner
I’ll be co-moderating along with Jon C. Walls, a senior financial advisor with Principle Management Consulting who has organized several South Dakota trust companies.
The program will include the best business models and jurisdictions to use for hosting trust companies in various favorable states like South Dakota, Delaware and Nevada.
For all the insights, click here to register.
Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/headlines/webinar
Nevada’s Oldest Trust Company Calls it Quits After 107 Years in Business
Posted by Scott Martin in News on July 31, 2010
Exclusive
Experts blame regulator and over-burdensome rules for closure and zero growth since enactment of higher capital requirements. Complying with Nevada’s residency requirement rules worries most local firms with sizable non-Nevada business. New players continue to find better alternatives from other states.
Reno based Nevada Agency and Trust Company had been doing business since 1903, but Andrea Cardinalli, the company’s president, decided to abandon its state trust charter earlier this year.
“We did let it expire,” she confirms. “And we’ve changed our name to reflect that.”
Now known as Nevada Agency and Transfer, Reno-based NATCO is not aggressively pursuing another charter from any other state or federal agency.
Cardinalli wasn’t eager to talk about operating conditions for retail trust companies in Nevada, but the state’s decision to tighten the rules late last year probably made it easier for NATCO to cut the 100-year cord.
“There is the distinct possibility that the Financial Institutions Division is causing the lowest-capitalized trust companies to leave,” says Matthew Saltzman, a banking attorney at Las Vegas law firm Kolesar & Leatham.
“Some might not be able to comply with the new requirements,” he added. “Others may just not want to do so.”
NATCO was not a prominent player in the Nevada trust landscape. Neither Saltzman nor Nevada Trust president Peter Kingman was familiar with the company, which has moved away from trust services over the decades to focus on the stock transfer and registrar business.
Although most institutions that engage in these activities have traditionally been banks or independent trust companies, you don’t actually need a trust charter to do so.
In fact, because NATCO isn’t a bank, it needed to register with the SEC and comply with federal securities industry rules whether it kept its state charter or not.
However, Nevada’s stricter rules made it more expensive to keep that charter. Even though NATCO was grandfathered into the new capital requirements, it still would have had to commit an extra $200,000 by October 1 and another $250,000 a year for the next two years.
It also needed to meet various customer residency tests to prove that it was primarily doing business with Nevada clients.
Because most Nevada trust companies serve a primarily out-of-state client base, this rule looks especially onerous to L. Scott Walshaw, the state’s former banking commissioner.
“I don’t think it’s enforceable,” he says. “Someone ought to take the regulator to court on this one. But in the meantime, it only encourages trust companies to leave the state.”
The canary meets the coalmine
NATCO’s quiet exit brings the number of public trust companies operating in Nevada its lowest level in over a year, and Matthew Saltzman agrees with Walshaw: more departures are on the horizon.
“As the state goes from an attractive low-cost jurisdiction to a more expensive one, marginal players may be more likely to relocate to South Dakota or wherever the hot jurisdiction is right now,” he says.
While client privilege prevented him from telling me who it is, he says at least one more trust company is planning on abandoning its Nevada charter in order to become a more loosely regulated family trust company instead.
Chicago financial institutions lawyer John P.C. Duncan warned of such a flight from the state last year when he asked the Nevada legislature to soften the new rules.
Unless a more trust-friendly overhaul could be found, he warned back in April of last year, trust companies would “be driven from Nevada or barred from being licensed here.”
That testimony appears to have come true. While Duncan’s amendments helped save Nevada’s private trust companies, their retail cousins got no such savior.
While “friendlier jurisdictions” like South Dakota are luring big business from out-of-state applicants, Nevada has not licensed a single public trust company since last May, when Saturna Trust got its charter—well before the heavier regulatory burden kicked in.
Whether Nevada lets more trust institutions slip off its rolls or starts actively courting new ones, Matthew Saltzman would simply like to see the state clarify its position.
“A more formal Nevada trust office needs to be established,” he says. “Unfortunately, there’s no way to compensate the regulators based on the amount of license fees the state brings in.”
Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes contributed to the research and the editing.
Rate this story, click here.
Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/natco
SEC’s Top Cop Says Agency to Police Collective Investment Trusts
Posted by Scott Martin in News on April 17, 2010
Collective funds are by law on the turf of bank regulators. But the SEC’s new anti-Madoff crusade now wants to put collective products on agency’s hit list.
“The SEC can’t get into the bank, but I can get into the advisors. It’s important for me to see if the banks are using their exemption properly … or merely renting a space [to advisors] inside a trust company,” says SEC’s Andrew “Buddy” Donohue, head of the SEC’s investment management unit.
Donohue fired a warning shot at bank regulators by threatening to go after the advisors who sell collective investment trusts. Experts say a move like that may just be saber rattling, but it pits the SEC against bank regulators over oversight of about $1.6 trillion in the collective funds market.
On the surface, these vehicles—also known as collective trusts, commingled funds or common trust funds—look a lot like institutional mutual funds and invest in all the conventional asset classes. Advisors do brisk business selling them to retirement plans.
But while mutual funds are SEC-registered, collective investment trusts are managed by a bank trust department and so falls under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is part of the Treasury Department.
If Donohue gets his way, that may change. In a speech at Practicing Law Institute’s Investment Management Institute in New York, he said he’s got his eye on these bank products. If he decides they need tighter regulation, he’ll make it happen, one way or another.
“I can’t get into the bank,” he reportedly elaborated in an off-script comment after the speech. “But I can get into the advisors.”
The OCC has refused to rise to the bait so far. All I got out of them was a terse “we’re aware of it and no comment.”
Rattling the Chains
Longtime agency watchers are a lot more expansive, but on the whole they’re a little mystified at what you could read as an SEC power grab.
“Collective investment trusts used to be considered a settled matter,” Maureen Young, a partner at high-powered law firm Bingham McCutchen, told me.
“If the SEC is really concerned about these products, maybe they’re hoping that they can get some response by rattling the chains and going after the brokers,” she added.
George Washington University law professor Arthur Wilmarth filled me in on the long struggle over who would regulate these products following the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act over a decade ago.
“As they say, nothing is as precious in Washington as a bit of turf,” he told me. “They fought for years and just couldn’t agree,” he added. “It took Congress basically threatening to bang the agencies’ heads together to get the job done.”
By the time the last dust settled, it was already 2007 and the once-obscure collective investment trust was becoming big business in retirement plans.
There’s about $1.6 trillion invested in these trusts now, according to Morningstar data. About half of it is in traditional pension funds; the other $800 billion—the real growth market—is in 401(k)s and other defined contribution accounts.
Getting Tough
Some of the people I interviewed for this story suspect that the size of this marketplace is the factor that brought it to the SEC’s attention after years of letting the OCC tend its own knitting.
Others wonder whether the SEC is looking for ways to prove that it’s indispensable in a world where the Obama Administration seems intent on reshuffling the regulatory deck and all the agencies have made mistakes.
In any event, Donohue isn’t alone in talking tough.
“We simply show up,” said Gene Gohlke, associate director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance, Inspections and Examination, speaking at the same conference as Donohue.
“If there are allegations of wrongdoing, we don’t want to give firms a good deal of lead time to clean up,” he added.
But while statements like this paint a tough picture of the commission as a sort of rapid-deployment vigilante regulator, it’s going to be tough to put that rhetoric into practice, former Nevada banking commissioner L. Scott Walshaw told me.
“From a bank regulator’s perspective, the OCC or whoever else is being stepped on is going to have something to say about this,” Walshaw, now a regulatory advisor at Advisors Institutional, says.
“Common sense would dictate that it makes more sense to just sit down with the OCC and maybe see if they can express their concerns without infringing on anybody’s turf,” he added.
Headed for the Mainstream
Meanwhile, there are already 1,200 collective investment trusts in Morningstar’s database and more launching all the time.
“We talk to established money managers about these vehicles every week,” says Steve Deutsch, who leads the company’s research in this area.
Deutsch sees collective trusts heading for the mainstream of the asset management marketplace very quickly. That’s probably why the SEC is getting involved, he says.
“If you want to be mainstream, you’ve got to have all the features of a mainstream product, and I think that’s what the SEC is concerned about,” he added.
As Deutsch notes, these trusts already walk and talk a lot like mainstream investment products. Improved record-keeping capabilities allow them to report NAV on a daily basis. They trade on Fund/SERV. And since Morningstar tracks them, there’s third-party transparency.
Last but not least, they are already strictly regulated—not only by the OCC, but in so far as collective trusts are essentially retirement plan options, by the IRS, ERISA and the Labor Department.
For example, Victory Capital Management is a substantial player in this space with about $3 billion in collective trust assets under management.
“It’s not like there’s no oversight,” says John Kutz, the head of the company’s retirement plan business.
“There’s tremendous oversight. There’s a lot of auditing. These are fiduciary products. The OCC makes sure every ‘i’ is dotted and every ‘t’ is crossed, at least where we’re concerned.”
Victory is still bullish on the business, expecting its AUM to double in the next few years. Evidently, a little oversight is worth the effort.
Scott Martin, contributing editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes contributed to the research.
Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/sec



