Posts Tagged Offshore Accounts
Bloomberg News: U.S. Millionaires Told Go Away as Tax Evasion Rule Looms
Posted by Steven Maimes in Daily Service, Headlines on May 8, 2012
Go away, American millionaires. That’s what some of the world’s largest wealth-management firms are saying ahead of Washington’s implementation of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, known as FATCA, which seeks to prevent tax evasion by Americans with offshore accounts.
HSBC Holdings Plc (HSBA), Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of Singapore Ltd. and DBS Group Holdings Ltd. (DBS) all say they have turned away business.
“I don’t open U.S. accounts, period,” said Su Shan Tan, head of private banking at Singapore-based DBS, Southeast Asia’s largest lender, who described regulatory attitudes toward U.S. clients as “Draconian.”
The 2010 law, to be phased in starting Jan. 1, 2013, requires financial institutions based outside the U.S. to obtain and report information about income and interest payments accrued to the accounts of American clients. It means additional compliance costs for banks and fewer investment options and advisers for all U.S. citizens living abroad, which could affect their ability to generate returns.
“In the long run, if Americans have less and less opportunities to invest overseas, it would be a disadvantage,” Marc Faber, the fund manager and publisher of the Gloom, Boom and Doom report, said last month in Singapore.
The almost 400 pages of proposed rules issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service in February create “unnecessary burdens and costs,” the Institute of International Bankers and the European Banking Federation said in an April 30 letter to the IRS, one of more than 200 submitted to the agency. The IRS plans to hold a hearing May 15 and could amend how and when some aspects of the rules are implemented. It can’t rescind the law.
Bank Transparency
The government needs to be tougher on offshore tax crimes than it has been, said U.S. Representative Richard Neal, a Massachusetts Democrat and one of the original sponsors of the legislation. FATCA, introduced after Zurich-based UBS AG (UBS) said in 2009 that it aided tax evasion by Americans and agreed to pay $780 million to avoid prosecution, is already helping to improve banking transparency, he said.
“People should know, and the IRS should know, what money is being held offshore and for what purpose,” Neal said. “I don’t think there’s anything unreasonable about that.”
UBS, the world’s biggest non-U.S. private bank according to London-based industry tracker Scorpio Partnership Ltd., said in 2008 it would discontinue offshore accounts for U.S. citizens. The firm now refers them to its wealth-management offices in the U.S., or to its Swiss Financial Advisers unit, which complies with U.S. and Swiss regulations, said Serge Steiner, a spokesman for UBS. The company continues to provide Americans outside the U.S. with services other than securities investments, including consumer and commercial loans, foreign-currency spot trading and precious-metals transactions, he said.
‘Too Complex’
Investments in products offered by third parties that non- U.S. citizens can purchase through UBS or other banks also may be restricted.
“Most of the hedge funds I know in Asia won’t take American clients,” said Faber.
Bank of Singapore, the private-banking arm of Oversea- Chinese Banking Corp. (OCBC), ranked strongest in the world for the last two years by Bloomberg Markets magazine, has turned away millions of dollars from Americans because it doesn’t want to deal with the regulatory hassle, according to Chief Executive Officer Renato de Guzman. The bank had $32 billion under management as of the beginning of the year.
“It’s too complex, too challenging,” de Guzman, who at 61 has more than 35 years of banking experience, said in an interview in Singapore in March. “You probably should have a dedicated team to handle them or to understand what can be done or what cannot be done.”
Rejecting Americans
At industry meetings he attends in Singapore, not accepting U.S. clients is “quite a prevailing sentiment,” de Guzman said. There are 18 private banks operating in Singapore, including units run by UBS, Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank (DBK) and HSBC, he said.
“We have enough business in Asia, so we don’t want to make our lives too difficult,” de Guzman said.
Asia has the world’s fastest-growing number of people with more than $1 million in investable assets, according to a report last year by Bank of America Corp. (BAC) and Capgemini SA. Singapore is Asia’s largest wealth-management center, with $512 billion in offshore assets in 2010, data compiled by the Boston Consulting Group show. Bank of America is the world’s No. 1 wealth manager, with $1.9 trillion under management, followed by Morgan Stanley and UBS, with $1.6 trillion, according to Scorpio.
HSBC, Deutsche Bank
HSBC decided last July that it would no longer offer wealth-management services to Americans from locations outside their home country after tax authorities stepped up a probe of the London-based bank’s U.S. clients.
Americans would be “better served” by private bankers in the U.S., Goh Kong Aik, a spokesman for the firm in Singapore, said in an e-mail. He declined to say whether those who already have private-banking accounts abroad will be allowed to remain customers, except that they would be helped through an undefined “transition process.”
Deutsche Bank said it terminated securities accounts held abroad by people with U.S. residency as of mid-2011. The action didn’t include checking or savings accounts and didn’t affect citizens living outside the U.S. The Frankfurt-based bank said “only a small number of customers” were affected.
Spokesmen for Credit Suisse, France’s BNP Paribas SA (BNP) and Amsterdam-based ABN Amro Bank NV, also among the top 10 non-U.S. global wealth managers, said their banks are studying the issue and haven’t decided what to do with American account holders.
Collateral Damage
“Bank accounts, investment accounts, mortgages and insurance policies are being refused to American clients, and those with accounts are seeing them closed or have been threatened with closure,” Marylouise Serrato, executive director of American Citizens Abroad, a Geneva-based organization, wrote in an e-mail.
U.S. citizens who live in countries that aren’t served by U.S. banks may find themselves unable to bank at all, and implementation of the law in its current form could cause collateral damage to American businesses abroad, she said.
“Americans either will not be allowed to enter into international partnerships or live and work overseas, and will be replaced by foreign nationals who do not have these limitations,” Serrato wrote. “The extensive reporting requirements of FATCA will be destructive to those who wish to do business internationally as well as to those Americans who are legitimately living and working overseas.”
‘Turned Away’
That view is shared by Richard L. Weisman, Hong Kong-based head of law firm Baker & McKenzie LLP’s global tax practice.
“U.S. expatriates already face severe U.S. tax rules related to their non-U.S. income and investments,” Weisman said. “FATCA will increase the extent to which they are turned away by non-U.S. financial institutions.”
Tan of DBS said she refers Americans seeking private- banking services to U.S. institutions with operations in Singapore such as Citigroup Inc. (C), Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and JPMorgan Chase & Co., which are able to open securities accounts for Americans because they’re regulated by U.S. authorities. Such accounts allow purchases of investment products without restricting Americans to cash and time-deposit accounts.
While that may be easy for Americans in Singapore, those who live elsewhere face obstacles. Before FATCA, U.S. citizens in Bangkok or Manila could find investment opportunities through non-U.S. banks such as HSBC. Now their only option is to fly to cities where U.S. firms operate.
Limited Choices
If Americans choose to bank with a non-U.S. firm such as HSBC, their investment choices are limited. At the HSBC branch in the bank’s Asia regional headquarters in Hong Kong, Americans can hold only savings deposits. They’re prohibited from opening accounts to trade local stocks or buy products available to non- U.S. customers, including 45 equity funds investing in China or other geographies and industries. There’s only one comparable emerging-markets equity option available on HSBC’s U.S.-based investors’ website.
Financial institutions that choose not to accept American customers still must determine whether new or existing clients are so-called U.S. persons in order to comply with FATCA, according to Michael Brevetta, director of U.S. tax consulting at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in Singapore.
The definition includes citizens, green-card holders and non-Americans deemed U.S. residents by being present in the country for at least 183 days over a three-year period, which makes them subject to U.S. tax on their worldwide income, according to the IRS.
Compliance Costs
The compliance costs for banks, asset managers and insurance companies “could stretch into the billions of dollars,” Brevetta said. Private-banking firms in Hong Kong and Singapore already have operating costs between 88 percent and 90 percent of their revenue, compared with 70 percent at Swiss banks, PricewaterhouseCoopers estimated in a September report.
Penalties for not complying will be stiff. Non-U.S. firms that don’t make required disclosures will be subject to 30 percent withholding of certain dividends, interest or proceeds from the sale of assets they or their customers receive from U.S. sources, according to Baker & McKenzie’s Weisman, who has conducted workshops and seminars on the proposed rules for current and potential clients in Hong Kong and Singapore.
“Overwhelmingly, financial institutions outside the U.S. don’t like it, for obvious reasons,” Weisman said, calling the withholding tax a “stick” the U.S. is wielding. “The U.S. is outsourcing a tax-compliance function, which is enormously expensive.”
Renouncing Citizenship
Americans who don’t comply with FATCA are deemed “recalcitrant,” and income they receive from U.S. sources also is subject to a 30 percent withholding tax, said Jason Choi, a Singapore-based tax lawyer with Latham & Watkins LLP.
Renouncing citizenship is an option chosen by increasing numbers of Americans. A record 1,780 gave up their U.S. passports last year compared with 235 in 2008, the IRS reported.
Royal Bank of Canada (RY), the sixth-biggest wealth manager with $435 billion under management as of the beginning of 2011, said it sees an opportunity as competition is exiting, including in emerging markets, where it manages $60 billion.
“We are one of the few wealth managers to hold a Securities and Exchange Commission license offering U.S.- compliant investment advice in Switzerland and London and see an opportunity in accepting tax-compliant U.S. persons as clients outside of the U.S.,” said Barend Janssens, the Singapore-based head of the bank’s wealth-management unit for emerging markets.
Tax Evasion
Coutts, the wealth division of U.K. government-owned Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc, plans to comply with FATCA and to continue accepting tax-compliant U.S. persons, according to Tim Winter, associate director of the U.S. Competence Centre at Coutts. The London-based bank has invested since July 2010 in a “global program of work established to support the implementation of FATCA,” he said in an e-mail.
The Swiss government has been in talks for more than a year with U.S. authorities, who, after obtaining data on about 4,700 UBS clients, are now investigating 11 other firms, including Zurich-based Credit Suisse (CSGN) and Julius Baer Group Ltd., for alleged assistance in U.S. tax evasion.
Credit Suisse continues to “work hard” to resolve the probe, CEO Brady Dougan said in an interview April 25. Julius Baer exited its U.S. private-client business between 2009 and 2011, said Jan Vonder Muehll, a bank spokesman in Zurich.
Wegelin Forfeiture
Wegelin & Co., a Swiss private bank established in 1741, became the first Swiss lender to face criminal charges in the U.S. crackdown on offshore firms suspected of abetting tax evasion. It had to sell its assets in January to Switzerland’s Raiffeisen Group to save its non-U.S. business before the U.S. indicted the firm in February. The St. Gallen-based private bank helped Americans hide more than $1.2 billion in assets and evade taxes, wooing clients spurned by UBS, according to an indictment filed in federal court in New York.
U.S. District Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Wegelin to forfeit $16 million on April 24, allowing the U.S. government to take the amount from Wegelin’s U.S. account, held at UBS in Stamford, Connecticut. Albena Bjoerck, a spokeswoman for Wegelin, declined to comment.
Spokesmen for Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan all declined to comment on how FATCA is affecting their business, with some citing company policies not to discuss government regulation. Standard Chartered Plc (STAN), France’s Societe Generale SA, Barclays Plc (BARC) and Hong Kong-based Hang Seng Bank Ltd., which all have wealth-management businesses, also declined to comment.
‘Pain for Americans’
The restrictions on products available to Americans may not matter to a savvy investor, according to Hugh Young, who helps manage $70 billion in Asian equities in Singapore for Aberdeen Asset Management Plc.
“The financial institutions can restrict you from some of the best products, but you have others of the best,” he said.
Still, the limitations create complications that act as an investment deterrent, said Philip Marcovici, a retired U.S. tax lawyer who advises wealthy families and governments.
“It’s a pain for Americans to invest in markets outside of the U.S.,” he said.
Source: Bloomberg News
Posted by Steven Maimes, The Trust Advisor
Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/headlines/fatca
Clients Behaving Badly: Why You Should Get Rid of an Unscrupulous Client
Posted by Jerry Cooper in News, Practice Management on October 23, 2009
Greed is back. As markets recover, clients begin a marathon to make up losses. For many, it’s going to be a legitimate race. But, for others — who see themselves with a sense of entitlement, their eyes will be on cutting corners through insider trading profits, creditor fraud and tax evasion.
These undesirable clients will seek your help. They may use their account relationship with you to hide their deeds. If you ignore red flags as they appear you may be unwittingly drawn in as their willful accomplice.
If your honor and reputation is worth more to you than your client’s questionable business, this report should offer some guidance on how to begin the process of protecting yourself.
“Greed is good.” This is the credo of the aptly named Gordon Gekko (Michael Douglas), the antihero of Oliver Stone’s 1987 film Wall Street. Gekko, a high-rolling corporate raider, is idolized by young-and-hungry broker Bud Fox (Charlie Sheen). Inveigling his way into Gecko’s inner circle, Fox quickly learns to rape, murder and bury his sense of ethics. Only when Gekko’s wheeling and dealing causes a near-tragedy on a personal level does Fox “reform”-though his means of destroying Gekko are every bit as underhanded as his previous activities on the trading floor.
As life often imitates art, a real life version of the movie Wall Street played itself out in the courtroom and media less than ten years ago. In this real life drama, the antihero was Martha Stewart, the media mogul and cooking diva whose sense of entitlement included insider information about ImClone Systems at the end of 2001.
Stewart avoided a loss of $45,673 by selling 3,928 shares of her ImClone Systems stock in late 2001. The day following her sale, the stock value fell 18%. When asked officially if she sold one day before the stock’s collapse on insider information, she said “no.”
Stewart needed the help of Peter Bacanovic, her stockbroker at Merrill Lynch to corroborate her story. Both Stewart and Bacanovic were boxed into a corner by making false statements to investigators.
As a Federal jury found, Bacanovic was covering up for Stewart. Bacanovic placed a very high value on preserving and protecting his relationship with the cooking diva. He traded his career, ethics and values to protect her.
From Brokerage House to the Big House
The parallel between fiction and fact saw the ended careers of both Fox in Wall Street and Bacanovic, Stewart’s broker in real life. Bacanovic wound up serving five months in Federal Prison near Las Vegas and five months of probation. He was fired from his job at Merrill Lynch and banned from the securities industry.
He said in a New York Times interview, “I was indicted not because I was the biggest criminal on the block or the biggest insider trader in history. I was indicted simply to bring a case against my celebrity co-defendant. I was a device.”
An advisor can be blinded by client loyalty, says Dayle Carlson, a well-respected criminal law expert and correctional consultant in Northern California. It takes a sense of ethics and clear values to draw a line between right and wrong.
I interviewed Carlson last week for this report from his office in Sacramento. He said that the profits created from a good client may often overshadow the sense of right and wrong. A client relationship often involves social events such as golf tournaments, tennis matches and parties. It’s tough to say “no” to a client when you’re managing millions of dollars.
Carlson sees all kinds of criminal behavior, but when it comes to financial crimes involving greed and fraud, the theme is often consistent. Carlson calls it “hubris behavior” which he sees quite frequently in his practice. His definition is one who is both extraordinarily arrogant and exhibits a strong sense of entitlement. In Stewart’s case, Carlson is correct.
Carlson says hubris behavior may offer you a clue that your client is on the wrong path. He added that your client may send you other signals.
These include:
- Reluctance to Discuss Account Changes. Clients reluctant to provide information for updating account information or transaction processing.
- Conflicting Information. Clients who provide conflicting information without providing explanations for their inconsistencies.
- Suspicious Activity. A sudden change in the pattern of business involvement. A request for wire transfers or transaction with unknown sources.
He added that observing stressful behavior is also a key to knowing what your client might be doing. Carlson said, “Stress may come from addiction such as gambling or sexual addiction or from financial problems.”
Spotting Trouble
Keeping an eye on your clients is part of your duty. Section 326 of the Patriot Act and other requirements of your customer identification program should require frequent screening of your client’s activities to detect any kind of suspicious activity.
Although there is no screening formula that can be used to detect a client with a bankrupt value system, asking the right questions may often yield results. Tax evasion might manifest itself in the sudden use of offshore corporations, foreign trusts or an increased desire to travel to places like the Cayman Islands and Liechtenstein.
Much of the luster of offshore bank accounts has worn out amidst the aftermath of the UBS scandal, but there still remains the diehard client who is bent on cheating Uncle Sam and feels fully justified because he may not like the way the government is being run.
Insider trading is another slippery slope that you as an advisor need to watch for. The last thing you need is to be asked by your client “do you have any inside information.” When I was a stockbroker I used to get that question asked all the time and my answer was always no. However, the client that can’t accept no from his advisor often doesn’t stop with you.
He may continue pursuits and go right to the source of the information he seeks in order to determine how to make a trade on your watch with inside information.
Silence Is Not Golden
If you detect that a client may be up to no good, keeping quiet about it can be your biggest mistake. With prosecutors looking at ensnaring as many people that help the culprit as possible, financial advisors are prime targets. The ostrich approach of sticking your head in the sand and ignoring the telltale signal of criminality can make you an accomplice and culpable in any legal proceeding.
Therefore, it is important and crucial that, upon discovery, your suspicions be reported to the compliance department and a plan be undertaken to give the client his pink slip.
It’s good business to get rid of your bad clients. Prosecutors look for wealthy clients who are considered highly valued targets for their prosecutions. Early detection and elimination of bad apples can save both your career and a great deal of embarrassment to your firm.
Jerry Cooper, senior editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes contributed to the research.
