Posts Tagged WHG

Westwood Trust’s “Common Trust Funds” Emerge as Bellwether Business Model for Advisors

Westwood Holding Group

Exclusive

CEO says new funds can be started in minutes, not months, at a fraction of the cost of a mutual fund.

Earlier this month The Trust Advisor reported Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (NYSE:  WHG), through its trust company unit Westwood Trust, helped forge gains by landing large new accounts while other firms sat on the sidelines. Westwood managed to bring in $2 billion in new assets during the toughest year in recent financial memory.

As part two of our report on Westwood Trust, I had an opportunity to chat once again with Brian Casey, President and CEO of Westwood, to drill down into the topic of interest to most wealth advisors – common trust funds.

New Money from an Old Idea

Simply stated, common trust funds or “CTFs” permit the commingling or pooling of investors’ money into one account (known as a common fund) for the purpose of creating a single investment. In other words, they are much like a mutual fund. They actually pre-date mutual funds so they are an old concept. Since they are a bank product, CTFs are not required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and they are not considered to be a security under state and federal securities laws. They are regulated under OCC Regulation 9 (12 CFR 9.18) and are supervised by state or federal bank regulators. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , , , ,

1 Comment

Westwood Trust Shines Helping Advisor Pull In $2 Billion in New Accounts During Meltdown

Brian CaseyExclusive

In a year when registered investment advisors have faced impossible challenges to stay ahead, one wealth management firm in Texas found opportunity and success. 

Westwood Holdings Group, Inc. (NYSE:  WHG) through its trust company unit Westwood Trust, helped forge gains by landing large new accounts while other firms waited, worried, and sat on the sidelines.  

Last summer my research team noticed a blip on our radar screen when looking for firms that stood out during the meltdown.  These are firms that increased managed assets for the year September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009. 

The firm that stood out was Westwood Holdings Group, company with little press attention, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and a top performing wealth manager.  

Last month I had an opportunity to chat with Brian Casey, President  and CEO of Westwood, to discuss how his firm managed to bring in $2 billion in new assets during the toughest year in recent financial memory.  Reviewing SEC reports, I looked at money managers that weathered the meltdown and it was not hard to understand how Westwood was able to mark this achievement. 

The Secret 

Although Westwood has been in business since 1983,  its  strategies were illuminated when  it became public in 2002. But, the true story of Westwood Trust began  in 1998. 

Westwood Trust’s mission is to provide high quality products and services to its high net worth clients.  Casey calls it “offering a competent investment professional to assist them with structuring a portfolio, and meeting the objectives whatever they may be trying to accomplish.”  

Westwood is not a financial planning trust company that provides directed trusts, dynasty trusts or self-settled trusts.  It is basically an eloquent investment store for a catered high end investment business segment. 

Westwood Holdings GroupIn the past five years Westwood’s managed assets have grown from $4.5 billion to $9.5 billion.

The reason for this growth was due largely to the way the firm had been structured. Many channels of diversification contributed and provided a continuous and steady growth.  

Casey, a native Texan for 40 years, describes Westwood as a diversified wealth management organization with three different business lines.  The first, Westwood Management Corp., began its investment business in 1983 as an institutional money manager.  Next, its trust company, Westwood Trust, a fully licensed and chartered trust company based in Texas that has been up and running for 12 years.  Third, its mutual fund business called WHG Funds, which has been in business for four years. 

The story of success is credited, in part,  to Westwood Trust.  Casey noted while other firms sat on the sidelines Westwood got its sales team out and prospected for new accounts.  

The result of course is recorded history.  Offsetting Westwood’s market losses experienced by most firms in the industry, Westwood was able to show net asset gains of $2 billion going from $7.5 billion at 9/30/08 to $9.5 billion at 9/30/09. 

Casey attributes this influx of new accounts to one concept: “high quality.”  Westwood knew it would have to rely on its high net worth business in order to sustain its asset levels, so it used its trust company as a main vehicle to reach new investors. 

The notion of providing an institutional quality product to its institutional clients, and having access to that through its trust company, created a unique combination of delivering quality to the marketplace to high net-worth clientele. 

I asked Casey whether he described the business at Westwood Trust as “retail.”  He did not feel comfortable with that word and said that his customers would not like to consider themselves retail customers.  He prefers to call them  private wealth investors—meaning the average account size for Westwood Trust is $2 million. 

How Did They Do It? 

Casey says that they’re constantly on the lookout for new customers in a way that’s different for most RIAs.  They primarily work through referrals and referral sources but have no wholesalers.  Casey adds “If you’re looking for the client that has $2 million or more you’re not going to find him answering an ad.  He’s going to have to come through a referral or direct call.” 

He adds that clients are doctors, professionals and entrepreneurs that have accumulated wealth over a lifetime but who see Westwood Trust as a shop that puts value and income first. 

Of particular importance is the fact that Westwood Trust offers common trust funds or commingled trust funds.  These are funds that act and behave like mutual funds and what Casey calls the precursor to mutual funds. “They are a tremendously efficient way of delivering institutional-quality investment products to clients.” 

He adds, “Commingled or common trust funds is a tool that allows us to deliver a well-diversified  institutional-quality product at a more reasonable fee than by trying to cobble together some outside mutual funds along with a separate account.” 

About Westwood 

When looking at Westwood it’s best to view Westwood in comparison to its peers.  The quick take snap shot provided by Morningstar gives Westwood stellar financial grades.  There are only three firms in the group which include Franklin Resources and T. Rowe Price that have “A” financial health ratings.  

Westwood’s market cap is only $268 million while the market cap of T. Rowe Price is $14 billion and Franklin’s is $25 billion.  So for a small company being managed efficiently they have done quite well in comparison to their peers.  Westwood is also accorded a “B” rating in profitability from the Morningstar analysis. 

All this being said, Westwood is an interesting story to follow both from the point of being a stellar asset manager, and owner of a trust company, and using that trust company in a way that allowed it to bring in important new accounts and new assets at a volatile time. 

 Next week more about Westwood, its operations, and an acquisition.

Jerry Cooper, senior editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. 

Story Permalink: http://thetrustadvisor.com/news/westwoodtrust1

, , , , , ,

2 Comments

Advisor Managed Common Trust Fund Accounts Disappear as Fiduciaries Fear Risk

Trust Advisor Survey: Surge in ERISA lawsuits, 2008 Advisor Performance Prompts Trustees to Turn Down New CTF Business; Regardless of Risk Compelling Benefits Remain

Exclusive Report

Common trust funds aren’t so common anymore. Wall Street’s on‐again off‐again love affair with common fund pooling arrangements appears to be on the rocks (at least for the time being), according to research conducted by The Trust Advisor Blog since the beginning of the year.

Chicago‐based Northern Trust, known to be a CTF platform provider of third‐party hosting arrangements for RIAs, reported “they no longer offer their platform for managers,” said Anna Jamroz of Northern Trust’s Global Fund Services group. Several other major banks have also ended the practice of permitting third‐party investment advisors to direct the portfolios held in common trust fund accounts.

Fund chart 11-09.jpgThese arrangements permit the CTF’s to re‐create mutual fund portfolios. Typically, this helps investors by lowering operating costs. Common fund accounts don’t require the expensive operating costs of a mutual fund such as printing, compliance, call centers, etc. All of this translates into lower expense ratios which benefit investors. Both Morningstar and Lipper maintain databases of over 1,000 funds for the purpose of tracking performance. Most of these CTF’s are hosted by banks or trust companies that also serve as investment advisor to the fund.

The history of common trust funds, or CTF’s, dates back to the Jules Verne era and they are almost as old as Wall Street itself. In simple terms, these arrangements permit the comingling or pooling of investors’ money into one account (known as a common fund) for the purpose of creating a single investment.

In other words, they are much like a mutual fund. However, CTF’s are not required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and they are not considered to be a security under state and federal securities laws. They are regulated under OCC Regulation 9 (12 CFR 9.18) and are supervised by state or federal bank regulators.

Just 16 months ago, collective funds were the darlings of Wall Street. They were featured in a July 24 article in The Wall Street Journal, ‘Collective Funds’ Gain Traction in 401(k)”. The WSJ reported “collective funds pool investors’ assets and invest in stocks, bonds and other securities. The chief difference: Collective funds are typically available only in retirement plans. Because they aren’t sold directly to the general public, they generally aren’t regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.”  The story added, “Collective funds tend to be substantially cheaper than mutual funds, largely because they don’t have to comply with SEC regulations or market to retail customers. That’s driving 401(k) plans to embrace these products, which are offered by big fund providers like Fidelity Investments, Vanguard Group and Charles Schwab Corp.”

Risky Third Party Arrangements

In a typical CTF setup, there is a trust and a trustee. The investors are called participants which are similar to shareholders. But because of the very nature of the arrangement as a trust, the trustee maintains full fiduciary responsibility. This includes responsibility for the profit or loss of the fund. The trustee cannot unload, delegate or bifurcate investment responsibility to a third party investment advisor without liability. In other words, the trustee is liable and responsible for the investment decisions of the advisor. If the common trust fund loses money, the trustee may be on the hook to make the investor whole in the event of a claim against the fund for a recovery.

All of this makes trustees very nervous when it comes to serving as trustee of a CTF managed by an investment advisor whose track record may have sustained losses. Since most advisors sustained double‐digit losses last year, it’s easy to see why trustees are scared.

In recent years, trustees have prided themselves on opting into roles that expressly limit their liability. These include directed trusts which permit the trustee to bear no responsibility for investment decisions as long as a directed trust is properly constructed and administered.

The Next Bull Market Scenario

A serious market recovery, renewed investor confidence and a boost in retirement wealth may spark another round of CTF mania in the coming years. If it does, there are mutual benefits for both the investor and the provider.

For the investor: he gains the ability to participate in fractional shares of managed accounts normally reserved for ultra‐high net worth investors who are prepared to put in $3 million to $4 million. With a common trust fund, an investor with as little as $100,000 or $200,000 can buy a share of a managed account and participate in the strategy and the gains (or losses) of a best‐of‐breed advisor.

Models that Work Now

According to reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Westwood Trust‐owner Westwood Holdings Group (WHG) of Dallas, TX hosts multiple common trust fund accounts. In this case, Westwood is also an investment advisor and also owns a trust company. This all‐in‐one arrangement does not put the responsibility of third‐party risk on its shoulders since the parent/owner is familiar with the strategy of the advisor and owns the trust company.

In a situation where the investment advisor owns a bank or trust company, CTF’s can make a lot of sense. Since there is no outsourcing of risk, the advisor feels comfortable about its strategy and therefore is willing to accept the additional responsibility associated with maintaining the CTF account.

WestIn another scenario, Davidson Trust of Montana is a combined trust company and investment advisory firm which offers its customer CTF accounts of pre‐approved and selected portfolios. I spoke to Davidson Trust Vice President Dennis West, who told me that their CTF accounts are popular with their investors. The firm has six different portfolios to choose from. Although the loads are somewhat heavy for smaller accounts of $1 million or less, the fees become lower when you leave Davidson more funds to work with. For more information, you can reach Dennis West at 1‐888‐389‐8001.

As more investment advisory firms begin to integrate trust operations, it makes more sense to also host common trust funds for these purposes. Given the compelling benefits these arrangements can yield investor savings and an ability to get into a fund with a best‐of‐breed strategy for a lower entry charge.

Jerry Cooper, senior editor, The Trust Advisor Blog. Steven Maimes contributed to the research.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments